About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
The Johnson Bill
The President's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner



Events


Subscribe to Social Security this Week e-newsletter
Congressional Corner


Johnson, Flake, Feeney et al., Individual Social Security Investment Program Act (HR 530)

Summary

Individuals born on or after January 1, 1950 would be allowed to divert their half (6.2%) of the payroll tax to individually owned, privately invested accounts. Those who choose to do so would agree to forgo all future accrual of retirement benefits under the traditional Social Security system. Individuals born after 1982 would be required to enter the private account system. The employer’s share of payroll tax (6.2%) would be used to pay transition costs and to fund disability and survivor benefits. The employer would assume responsibility for the entire DI contribution (1.8%) and would continue to pay 4.4% of capped payroll toward the OASDI portion of Social Security.

A federal government safety net provision will insure that no retiree's income falls below 100% of the poverty level. This provision will be funded through general revenues, much like a welfare (TANF) payment. Those who choose the private account option must purchase an inflation-adjusted annuity to ensure that their retirement income will not fall below 100% of the poverty line.

Details

Voluntary Yes, for every worker under age 55 by 2005. It is compulsory for workers under 22
Account Size/Source Carve out: 6.2% of taxable earnings (employees' half of the payroll tax).
Additional Contribution  
Benefits from Current System Participants would receive a "recognition bond" based on their lifetime-to-date benefits. These bonds, redeemable at the worker's retirement, would be tradable in secondary markets. There would be no future accrual of retirement benefits under the traditional Social Security system.
Investment Structure Account balances would be invested in a three-tiered system:Tier I- money market fund until the contribution is reconciled to the individual's name using the W-2 form, Tier II- 3 portfolios: 60% stock and 40% bond (default), one with higher percentage in stock, and one with higher percentage in bonds, Tier III-Once a worker accumulated sufficient level of funds, a much larger range of investment options similar to 401(k) plans would be available.
Inheritability Account balance is fully inheritable.
Withdrawal Options Can choose an annuity, a programmed withdrawal, or a combination of an annuity and a lump-sum payment. For the last option, the amount above what is need to puchase an annuity providing income equal to 100% of poverty level can be taken out as lump sum. All withdrawals are exempt from income taxes, so accounts resemble Roth IRAs.
Minimum Benefit A federal government safety net provision will insure that no retiree's income falls below 100% of the poverty level. This provision will be funded through general revenues, much like a welfare (TANF) payment. Those who choose the private account option must purchase an inflation-adjusted annuity to ensure that their retirement income will not fall below 100% of the poverty line.
Changes to Benefit Formula Beginning in 2012, the formula for calculating the accrual of benefits would use earnings indexed to the increase in prices (measured by the CPI) rather than national wage growth.
Retirement Age Once an individual can purchase an annuity equal to 100% of poverty level, he or she can opt out of the system and stop paying the 6.2% individual account contribution.
Other Benefit Changes No additional changes.
Disability/Survivors No changes
Transition Funding Mechanism General revenue transfers

Bill Track

HR 530

Sponsor

Co-Sponsors

Relevant Testimony

June 16, 2005 Testimony of Ian Vasquez before the Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Social Security
June 14, 2005 Mike Tanner before the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on Securities and Investment,
May 17, 2005 Testimony of Michael D. Tanner before the Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security
May 12, 2005 Testimony of Michael D. Tanner before the Committee on Ways and Means
Apr 26, 2005 Testimony of Michael D. Tanner before the Senate Commitee on Finance



Printer Friendly Version



Key Points Fact Sheets
  Here are the latest Fact Sheets to help you make an informed decision:
Why is the Social Security System in Trouble?
Why Reform Social Security?
Cato's Social Security Plan
Why Does Social Security Need Reform?
Social Security and Low-Wage Earners
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go