About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Social Security Falsehoods

June 3, 2000

In a column printed in the May 26 Washington Times, economist Walter Williams details how the promises made by Social Security in good times turned out not to be promises at all. For instance, Williams cites a 1936 government Social Security pamphlet, which said:

"After the first three years -- that is to say, beginning in 1940 -- you will pay, and your employer will pay, 1.5 cents for each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. . . . Beginning in 1943, you will pay 2 cents, and so will your employer, for every dollar you earn for the next three years. . . . And finally, beginning in 1949, 12 years from now, you and your employer will each pay 3 cents on each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year. That is the most you will ever pay."

As most of us know, the payroll tax for Social Security now stands at 12.4 percent of the first $76,200 earned. Williams says, "Had Congress lived up to its promise, our maximum Social Security tax this year would be $90 instead of more than $6,000. The Social Security Act of 1935 would have never been enacted had Americans back then known that we would be subject to a $6,000 tax."

A second Social Security pamphlet declares that, "Beginning Nov. 24, 1936, the United States government will set up a Social Security account for you. . . . The checks will come to you as a right." As we now know, no accounts were ever set up. And the Supreme Court itself ruled that, unlike a true insurance program, workers have no right to benefits earned under Social Security.

In Fleming v. Nestor (1960), the court said, "To engraft upon Social Security system a concept of 'accrued property rights' would deprive it of the flexibility and boldness in adjustment to ever-changing conditions which it demands."

To learn more about property rights under Social Security, and how a system of personal accounts could give enhance workers' retirement security, see Property Rights: The Hidden Issue of Social Security Reform, by Charles E. Rounds Jr.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  "Saving" Social Security without individual accounts could require a 50% increase in Social Security taxes or a 27% cut in benefits.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"Cato has been an early and tireless advocate for private ownership and investment of payroll taxes."

- Julie Kosterlitz
National Journal
December 7, 2002