^M
About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Heritage Foundation Offers Guidelines for Social Security Reform

June 12, 2003

Senior research fellow at the "Heritage Foundation, David C. John, projects that Social Security reform will soon become a congressional priority. While personal account proposals are gaining support, he writes, "[S]ome lawmakers may be tempted to pass a Band-Aid that avoids the reforms necessary to assure real retirement security for future generations." John's "Six Important Rules for Real Social Security Reform" follow:

1) The benefits of current retirees and those close to retirement must not be reduced. Washington has a moral contract with those who currently receive Social Security retirement benefits, as well as with those who are so close to retirement that they have no other options for building a retirement nest egg. Unfortunately for seniors, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that they have no legal right to their benefits. Thus, any real reform plan must guarantee in law that both retirees and those who are close to retirement will receive every cent that the government has promised them, including an accurate annual cost-of-living increase.

2) The rate of return on a worker's Social Security taxes must be improved. Today's workers receive very poor returns on their Social Security payroll taxes. For example, an average two-earner couple in their early 30s will receive about 1.2 percent on their retirement taxes from Social Security ... Meaningful reform must therefore provide a better retirement income to future retirees without increasing Social Security taxes. The best way to do this is to allow workers to divert a portion of their existing Social Security taxes into a personal retirement account that can earn significantly more than Social Security can pay.

3) Americans must be able to use Social Security to build a nest egg for the future ... Workers should be able to use Social Security to build a cash nest egg that can be used to increase their retirement income or to build a better economic future for their families…. If a worker died before retirement, his or her personal retirement account would become part of the estate, providing a nest egg that heirs could use for income, education, opening a small business, or donations to a church or charity.

4) Personal retirement accounts must guarantee an adequate minimum income. Seniors must be able to count on a reasonable and predictable level of monthly income, regardless of what happens in the investment markets. Therefore, in reforming the system, Congress should ensure that every American who chooses to have a personal retirement account receives a retirement income that is at least equal to what he or she would receive from traditional Social Security. A retiree whose personal retirement account contains enough money to exceed the guaranteed benefit should be allowed to use the extra amount to increase his or her monthly income, take the excess in cash, or leave the money to his or her heirs.

5) Workers should be allowed to fund their Social Security personal retirement accounts by allocating some of their existing payroll tax dollars to them. Workers should not be required to pay twice for their benefits—once through existing payroll taxes and again through additional income taxes used to fund a personal retirement account.

6) For currently employed workers, participation in the new accounts must be voluntary. No one should be forced into a system of personal retirement accounts. Instead, currently employed workers must be allowed to choose between today's Social Security and one that offers personal retirement accounts. Americans who choose to divert part of their payroll tax into a personal retirement account should give up part of their traditional Social Security benefits in return for the higher earnings of a personal account.

2005 Index | 2004 Index
2003 Index | 2002 Index | 2001 Index
2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Access denied for user 'readonly'@'cemi.cato.org' (using password: YES)  
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"Thursday's staff report 'does a terrific job of setting out both the stick and the carrot: the stick in the form of the financial crisis and the carrot in the form of a better Social Security system,' said Michael Tanner, director of the Social Security Privatization Project at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank that has strongly influenced the Bush administration's work in this area."

- Los Angeles Times
July 202001