About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Social Security Empowerment

August 25, 1999

In her syndicated column on August 22, Josette Shiner, President of Empower America, highlighted the opportunities that Social Security reform presents and outlined the principles for reform that voters should demand:

Question: By all accounts, Congress and the Clinton administration have given up on Social Security reform for 1999, which means that the next president will have a major role in reform, making the issue ripe for the 2000 presidential race. What approach to reform should voters support?

Josette Shiner: First, voters should demand that candidates talk about the economic and social fruits of modernizing the nation's retirement system. Why should Americans settle for an outmoded, underfunded, low-yield (or no yield) national retirement system? For years now, Silicon Valley companies have made employee ownership a central tenet of good business, offering entry-level workers and executives alike a real stake in the success of the firm. We should expand this investment and ownership strategy to all American workers so each citizen can look forward not just to retirement security but retirement prosperity.

That's exactly what Empower America and other think tanks and grass-roots advocacy groups hope to accomplish by forming a new coalition called Social Security 2000. The group, chaired by former vice presidential candidate Jack Kemp, has united behind seven principles that should govern the transition to a system worthy of the New Economy:

  1. Guarantee all promised benefits to current and near-term beneficiaries.
  2. Give all workers the opportunity to generate increased retirement income and build personal assets by using a portion of their payroll taxes to establish Personal Retirement Accounts owned and directed by each worker.
  3. Give workers freedom of choice to remain in the current Social Security system or choose the new Personal Retirement Account system.
  4. Maintain a federal safety net, guaranteeing that each worker's retirement income under the new system would be no less than what Social Security would pay.
  5. Address and ultimately solve Social Security's long-term financing challenges without tax increases.
  6. Avoid imposing additional administrative costs on employers, particularly small businesses.
  7. Adopt pro-growth tax and regulatory policies that will increase the rate of return on the Personal Retirement Accounts and smooth the transition to a new system.

Reform based along the seven principles would not only protect seniors and ensure intergenerational fairness but would also provide vast new opportunities for low-income and minority Americans to participate in America's economic success. Voters should demand that candidates adhere to these principles.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  The full retirement age today is 65 years and four months. It rises by two months every year, gradually increasing to age 67 for people born after 1959.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"And there are more ideas-driven initiatives to come, including the partial privatization of Social Security, an issue that would still be unthinkable were it not for the relentless agitation of places like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute."

- The Economist
February 10, 2001