About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Lindsey on Social Security Privatization, the Economy, and the Trust Fund

September 7, 2001

During an interview on Fox News Sunday, Lawrence Lindsey, the White House's top economic advisor, said the privatizing of a portion of Social Security would improve economic growth.

Lindsey noted that "one of the things the President hopes to do is reform Social Security, to make it a 21st Century program and not a 1930s program…What we hope happens is that, for those people who want it, they are able to invest [a portion of their Social Security taxes] for their own retirement." Lindsey went on to point out that allowing workers to invest their Social Security taxes "would really help this economy. It would help the markets. It would help business confidence."

Several studies have shown that by increasing national savings and labor incentives, privatization would indeed offer a significant boost to economic growth. In particular, Martin Feldstein has suggested that Social Security privatization would provide the economy with a present value gain of $10-20 trillion, the equivalent of a permanent 5 percent increase in GDP. (Martin Feldstein, "Privatizing Social Security: The $10 Trillion Opportunity," Cato Institute Social Security Paper no. 7, January 31, 2001.)

Later, correspondent Brit Hume questioned Lindsey about the nature of the Social Security surplus and the Trust Fund. Hume belittled the idea of an untouchable Social Security "lock box," asking Lindsey, "Isn't it the case that [the Social Security surplus] will be very much touched, and it will in fact be loaned back to the government? Social Security will get IOUs or government securities, and what will happen is that the money will be used to pay down other government debt?"

Lindsey replied that the government was simply "rearranging the money, in a sense, to pay down some of its own debt." But Hume pressed, "So, in fact, [the surplus] will be gone as surely as if it had been kept by the taxpayers." Lindsey agreed, "There's no mattress out there."

Speaking of the Trust Fund, Hume then asked, "In fact, the money will not be there. Its just IOUs." And Lindsey, cutting to the essence of the Trust fund debate, admitted, "The only way for the government to get the money to pay benefits in the future will be to redeem the debt. And to do so, it's got to cut other spending or raise taxes…or borrow."

2002 Index | 2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Access denied for user 'readonly'@'cemi.cato.org' (using password: YES)  
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"Thursday's staff report 'does a terrific job of setting out both the stick and the carrot: the stick in the form of the financial crisis and the carrot in the form of a better Social Security system,' said Michael Tanner, director of the Social Security Privatization Project at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank that has strongly influenced the Bush administration's work in this area."

- Los Angeles Times
July 202001