
Social Security Reform Needed; Demographic Tidal Wave Poised to Swamp the
System
September 30, 1999
by Mark Neumann
Former Rep. Mark Neumann is currently serving as the National Social Security
Chairman for the Council for Government Reform.
Today, it seems like summer and the living is easy. The Congressional Budget
Office (CBO) just found another trillion dollars under the national couch cushions,
and we can finally stop thinking about tomorrow. But is that really the case?
There is one very important reason that we cannot afford to rush out and spend
this "surplus" that has suddenly buried Washington in money. And that reason
is the demographic tidal wave that will swamp the current Social Security system.
The people, known collectively as the baby boom generation, are steamrolling
toward retirement. When they reach retirement age, the ratio of workers to retirees
will hit record low levels. Can a pay-as-you-go retirement income security system
survive when there are only two workers supporting each and every retiree?
Barring a tragic and widespread die-off of boomers or a massive infusion of
high-wage immigrants, boomers face Social Security benefits that will be only
75 percent of those promised even if the government were to repay everything
they have stolen from the Social Security Trust Fund. Right now, we have a small
window for action. The massive boomer generation is reaching its peak earning
years. The retiring generation, the World War II generation, is somewhat smaller
than normal. This gives us a chance to break the chains of the failing pay-as-you-go
Social Security system and establish a fully funded retirement income security
system that will protect us in our retirement while not bleeding our younger
workers dry. During my years in Congress, I fought to make government come clean
with its accounting of the Social Security Trust Fund. This raid on the Trust
Fund is one of the worst examples of government excess I have ever encountered.
Thanks mostly to a healthy economy and a big payroll tax hike in 1982-1983,
the Social Security Trust Fund, which had operated mostly at break even for
its first 50 years, has started to accumulate a hefty surplus. That is, more
tax revenue was streaming into the fund than was being paid out in benefits.
This surplus was "invested" in special non-negotiable government bonds. These
bonds cannot be sold on the open market and should not be construed as representing
anything other than an IOU from one portion of the government to the other.
The bonds represent the future income taxes of our children and grandchildren,
not real assets with which we can pay benefits. The surplus in the trust fund
will continue only until the mid 2010s and then the fund will start draining
the general treasury (taxpayers) to pay promised benefits.
By sometime in the 2030s, those "notes" will be gone and current workers will
face a doubling or tripling of the payroll tax or retirees will face draconian
benefit cuts. This fiscal crash on the horizon is the single biggest reason
I have chosen to stay active on this issue. I cannot sit back and allow the
short-term vision of some incumbent politicians to sell my children and grandchildren
down the river. That's why I've joined with the Council for Government Reform,
a 500,000-supporter group that is striving to enact sensible changes in the
nation's Social Security system.
These are changes that will protect the benefits earned by current retirees
as well as ensure a system that will not forsake future retirees or bankrupt
our children and grandchildren. It is my view that it is entirely possible to
accomplish this goal. There is no need, other than for crass political gain,
to pit the retirement security of our nation's seniors against the economic
well-being of America's working class. This is a false choice generated by the
very structure of the current, failing system. We need to acknowledge that even
in this time of surplus, we will face hard times again.
The Council is working to stop the raid on the Social Security Trust Fund
and give seniors the peace of mind that their earned benefits will be paid while
allowing current workers the opportunity to more directly save for their retirement.
I am looking forward to engaging the American people in this great debate
about Social Security. I sincerely believe that no one wants to continue down
a road that will lead to lowered standards of living for our retirees and our
children. Not when solutions are at hand. I look forward to hearing your thoughts
and encourage you to visit the Council for
Government Reform's web site (www.govreform.org ) to learn more about our
project. This article originally appeared in The Washington Times on
September 27, 1999.
2001 Index | 2000
Index | 1999 Index | 1998
Index
|