About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Social Security Privatization and the Economy

October 5, 2001

With the American econ0my moving into a recession, it is worth remembering that Social Security privatization could help stimulate economic growth. While certainly not a short-term stimulus measure, allowing workers to invest their Social Security taxes is likely to provide significant long-term economic benefits.

Social Security operates on a pay-as-you-go basis, with almost all of the incoming funds paid out immediately to current beneficiaries. This system displaces private alternatives under which the funds coming in would be saved and invested for the future benefits of today's workers. The result is a large net loss of national savings, which reduces capital investment, wages, national income, and economic growth. Moreover, by increasing the cost of hiring workers, the payroll tax substantially reduces wages, employment, and economic growth as well.

A shift to a private system, with hundreds of billions of dollars being invested in individual retirement accounts each year, would likely produce a large net increase in national savings, depending on how the government financed the transition. This would increase national investment, productivity, wages, jobs, and economic growth. Replacing the payroll tax with private retirement contributions would also improve economic growth, because the required contributions would be lower and those contributions would be seen as part of a worker's direct compensation, stimulating more employment and output.

Harvard economist Martin Feldstein estimates that privatization of Social Security would produce $10 trillion to $20 trillion in present value net benefits to America. (See, Martin Feldstein, "Privatizing Social Security: The $10 Trillion Opportunity," Cato Institute Social Security Paper no. 7, January 31, 1997). That is essentially his estimate of the present value of the improved economic performance that would result from the reform. Most of that net benefit would probably come in the form of the higher returns and benefits earned for retirees through private investment accounts. But some would come in the form of higher wages and employment for working people.

2002 Index | 2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Access denied for user 'readonly'@'cemi.cato.org' (using password: YES)  
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"These days, the eyes of Cato officials are gleaming at the prospect that privatizing Social Security, a project on which the 24-year-old think tank has worked for years, may be coming to fruition. If privatizers can overcome a few problems that worry their own supporters, it could be a bold new future, with Cato ideas leading the way."

- Hartford Courant
Feb. 26, 2001