
The Real Social Security Statement
October 29, 1999
The Social Security Administration has begun sending out the new "Social Security
Statement," which purports to tell American workers how much they can expect
to receive in retirement benefits from Social Security. In effect, the Social
Security Statement says to workers, "If you earn this much and work to this
age, you'll receive this much in benefits when you retire."
But the Social Security Statement is next to useless as a financial planning
tool because its benefit estimates are based upon what Social Security promises,
not what it can pay. What the Social Security Statement fails to mention is
that unless taxes go up or the retirement age is increased, promised benefits
simply cannot be paid.
But there is a way to salvage some value from the Social Security Statement.
Based upon Social Security Administration projections, the Cato Institute has
constructed two charts against which a person can compare the taxes and benefits
listed on his own Social Security Statement to find out what Social Security
can really pay.
"Wanda Worker"
A good way to illustrate how the Social Security Statement does (and does
not) work is to look at the case of "Wanda Worker," a fictional statement recipient
designed by the Social Security Administration. Wanda was born in 1960 and earns
$30,364 per year. The Statement estimates that if she earns the same salary
for the rest of her career, Wanda could retire at age 62 with a monthly benefit
of $746 (in 1999 dollars), at 67 with a monthly benefit of $1,096, and at 70
with a benefit of $1,365.
By examining Wanda's case, we see how deceptive the Social Security Statement
really is. But we can also see how to make a real estimate of what Social Security
can pay.
Benefits
Chart A shows the Social Security system's funding deficit or surplus as a
percentage of benefits, using the Social Security Administration's "intermediate
cost" and "high cost" estimates of economic and demographic changes affecting
the program.
Two points are worth making at the outset. First, why are there two lines
on the charts? In estimating future costs, the Social Security Administration
creates three sets of estimates: high cost, intermediate cost, and low cost.
The intermediate cost estimates are those the SSA believes most likely to be
accurate. However, other experts, such as the non-partisan Concord Coalition,
believe the intermediate cost estimates to be over-optimistic. These experts
believe that the high cost estimates are more likely to be accurate. (Almost
no one believes the low cost estimates are likely to prove correct; for this
reason, they are not included.)
Second, why does Chart A show that Social Security is currently able to pay
118 percent of benefits? What this means is that Social Security today takes
in more payroll taxes than it needs. These surplus taxes are not added to benefits.
Instead, they are spent on general government expenditures with a promise placed
in the Social Security Trust Fund to pay them back in the future.
What can this chart tell us about Wanda Worker? Let's assume that Wanda works
until age 67, the normal retirement age, at which point Social Security would
pay her $1,096 per month.
Or would it? According to Chart A, which is based upon the Social Security
Administration's own projections, in 2027 Social Security will take in only
enough payroll taxes to pay between two-thirds and three-quarters of promised
benefits. In other words, based upon current payroll tax rates Wanda can expect
to receive only between $735 and $834, far less than she has been promised.
And there is no indication on the Social Security Statement that her benefits
would have to be cut by so much.
Making matters worse is that Wanda's benefits would decline each year. As
Social Security's financial situation worsens, the system would be able to pay
less and less of Wanda's benefits. So by 2037, when Wanda is 77 years old, her
monthly benefits would fall to $670-791, while by the time Wanda turns 87 her
monthly benefit could fall as low as $644 under SSA's high cost estimates.
Finding Your Benefits
To estimate the true amount of benefits Social Security is capable of paying
you, first find the year in which you retire on the chart. Then deduct from
the benefits promised you in your own Social Security Statement the percentage
of benefits the chart shows to be unfunded. This is how much Social Security
can pay you without any increase in payroll taxes. But remember, it is only
valid for the year in which you retire. For each following year, you would need
to adjust the benefit estimate downward to reflect Social Security's worsening
financial position.
Taxes
In the first section we focused on the benefit side. But you can also look
at Social Security from the tax side. Instead of asking how much benefits your
current taxes will provide, you can determine how much taxes would have to rise
in order to pay the benefits you've been promised.
Chart B shows that today's payroll taxes could be cut, because Social Security
is currently running a surplus. By 2037, however, taxes would have to rise by
28-39 percent if promised benefits are to be paid.
What does this mean in practice? Today's payroll tax rate is 12.4 percent
of wages and salary. Wanda Worker retires in the year 2037, at age 67. To pay
the $1,096 dollar monthly benefit she has been promised, workers in 2037 would
have to see their total Social Security tax burden increase to between 15.9
and 17.2 percent of their wages.
As with the Chart A, the level of taxes necessary to pay promised benefits
increases over time. By the time Wanda is 77, taxes would need to rise to between
15.8-17.6 percent of wages. By age 87, the high cost estimates show taxes might
have to rise as high as 18.1 percent.
Find the Tax Rate Needed to Pay Your Benefits
To find the payroll tax rate that must be paid by future workers to deliver
the benefits promised you in your Social Security Statement, simply find the
year in which you retire. The intermediate and high cost estimates show how
much taxes must increase by. For each following year, tax rates might have to
increase again in order to maintain full payment of your benefits.
What these numbers don't show, however, is whether future workers will be
willing to pay those extra taxes. At 12.4 percent, payroll taxes are already
too high, crowding out any personal savings many workers wish to make. Would
future voters be willing to see increases in their payroll tax rates of up to
50 percent? Perhaps, but perhaps not. That is part of the risk involved with
a pension system linked to the political process.
Conclusion
The new Social Security Statement has been advertised as a useful financial
planning tool. By itself, it is not worth much. But a little digging into Social
Security Administration projections provides a more accurate view of what Social
Security can really pay. It's not good news. But it may provide the impetus
to move to a privatized program based on personal retirement accounts that can
really pay the benefits it promises.
2001 Index | 2000
Index | 1999 Index | 1998
Index
|