About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Gore Attacks Bradley on Social Security

November 3, 1999

Vice President Al Gore attacked his rising Democratic opponent, former New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, for being open to the possibility of raising the retirement age for Social Security eligibility. Bradley "won't make firm a commitment to defending the current age for Social Security," Gore spokesman Chris Lehane said. "We should keep that commitment." Bradley responded by saying that, "any time you put out a big idea to deal with a big problem, it's vulnerable to scare tactics. That is precisely what's going on here."

Raising the retirement age is hardly the solution to Social Security's problems. At the same time, it is ironic for Gore to attack Bradley when the Administration's own plan can do no better than introducing back-door tax increases on workers, and even that doesn't keep Social Security solvent for the long term or improve its miserable rate of return to workers.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Social Security will begin running a deficit by 2017.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"And there are more ideas-driven initiatives to come, including the partial privatization of Social Security, an issue that would still be unthinkable were it not for the relentless agitation of places like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute."

- The Economist
February 10, 2001