About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Compare and Contrast

November 27, 2002

In a new column, Scott Burns of the UPI syndicate explains that "Social Security return can't match private investment."

The Great Depression was a financial crisis, Burns says, and "The solution was Social Security... Put a small tax on all workers. Use it to provide a basic income for all retirees. So from 1937 through 1949, the combined employer/employee tax of 2 percent of the first $3,000 of wages cost each worker $30. It also cost his employer $30."

"[T]he benefits were amazing," Burns says. "For workers born in 1880 and retiring in 1945, the 'return' was about 32 percent."

"Unfortunately, it didn't stay that way... Today, the employment tax, which includes Medicare as well as retirement benefits, takes 15.3 percent of the first $84,900 in wages."

"As the tax rate has risen, the 'return' from Social Security has declined. For the retirees of 1955, the 'return' was just over 15 percent. By 1965 it was under 10 percent. By 1995 it was under 3 percent. And by 2005 it is expected to be less than 2 percent. We are entering a period in which actual returns in the private economy are better than 'virtual' returns of Social Security."

"By one set of calculations, the net value of all payments peaked in 1981. It declined sharply for retirees of 1985 and continued to decline. Those who retire in 2005 will be the first Social Security retirees who will have paid in slightly more than they are likely to receive in benefits. If you were born after 1960, the prognosis is worse: You will lose an amount similar to the amounts gained by the first 50 years of Social Security retirees."

Assuming an expected 17.6 years of life after retirement, what "would take 31 percent of income ... would take only 12 percent of income to do the same with private earnings."

Burns concludes that real market returns are the only solution to Social Security's deficiencies. "Invested for real (instead of virtual) returns, our employment tax dollars might earn enough to keep up with our increasing life expectancy."

2005 Index | 2004 Index
2003 Index | 2002 Index | 2001 Index
2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Lost connection to MySQL server at 'reading initial communication packet', system error: 113  
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"...the Cato Institute, the libertarian think tank that has been the most passionate proponent of privatization."

- The Washington Post
June 7, 2001