About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Items from the White House Social Security conference-TSP

December 15, 1998

At last week's White House conference on Social Security, both former Social Security Commissioner Robert Ball and Henry Aaron, of the Brookings Institution, suggested that the federal Thrift Savings Program (TSP), a retirement benefit program offered to federal employees, is an example of a successful government retirement investment plan that's not politicized. The director of the Cato Institute Project on Social Security Privatization, Michael Tanner, says it ain't so:

"In reality, the TSP is a defined contribution system of individually owned accounts, much closer to the type of program advocated by Cato than to proposals to allow the government to invest the Social Security Trust Fund. Workers have a property right to their TSP account, meaning that there is a fiduciary duty governing the investment of those funds. Further, as a defined contribution program, investment decisions are transparent--workers can see the impact of any investment decisions on their future retirement benefits and object if politicized investments reduce returns. Indeed, since the TSP is voluntary, workers can even refuse to participate if they dislike the program's investment policy. The TSP in no way assuages concerns over government investing."

There's an interesting extended discussion of the federal Thrift Savings Plan in Mike Tanner's recent Cato briefing paper, "The Perils of Government Investing."

Catholic Charities versus the Poor

Catholic Charities, USA has always claimed that it judges public policy changes by how they would affect the poor. Imagine our surprise and anger to see Sharon Daly, spokeswoman for Catholic Charities, on C-SPAN railing against Social Security privatization. This, despite the fact that the current system hurts the poor, and that privatization would dramatically increase returns for low-income workers.

Catholic Charities used to be one of the most efficient and nonpolitical charitable organizations in the United States, but they are now preoccupied with advancing an anti-free-market big-government agenda. In today's commentary, Stephen Moore argues that Catholics should begin to rethink their support for Catholic Charities, now that their contributions partially finance a propaganda campaign to prop up the welfare state.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  "Saving" Social Security without individual accounts could require a 50% increase in Social Security taxes or a 27% cut in benefits.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"And there are more ideas-driven initiatives to come, including the partial privatization of Social Security, an issue that would still be unthinkable were it not for the relentless agitation of places like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute."

- The Economist
February 10, 2001