About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Here We Go Again

December 17, 1999

Just as the previous budget year -- replete with competing "lock-boxes" that would "save Social Security first" -- ended with the federal government dedicating over $17 billion of surplus payroll taxes to general expenditures, House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Majority Leader Dick Armey have written to President Clinton insisting that he propose a budget for next year that neither spends Social Security surpluses nor raise taxes.

But next year will be no different from the last. A lock-box, even one that is not "picked," is not nearly enough to prevent Social Security's insolvency. And it does absolutely nothing to improve the low rates of return minorities receive from Social Security, give workers a property right to their benefits, or an inheritance to pass on to their children. Both the President and the Congress should set their sights a little higher.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Every two-year election cycle that we wait to reform Social Security costs an additional $320 billion.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"For the White House, Cato is an indispensable source of expertise-with two decades of pro-privatization research and lobbying under its belt, it knows more about the issue (of Social Security) than just about anyone else in Washington."

- Ryan Lizza
The New Republic
August 13, 2001