About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Biggs Responds to Gephardt's Discrediting Personal Retirement Accounts

May 2, 2002

Jo Mannies of the St. Loius Post Dispatch writes in "Gephardt Blasts Bush's Idea of Partly Privatizing Social Security," House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt has come out full force against President Bush and his administration. Specifically, the Gephardt continues to discredit Bush's plans to reform the flailing Social Security system. He reverts to the "scare old people" strategy which makes the current retirees believe that their benefits will be cut.

Andrew Biggs responds to the Mannies article and to Gephardt's attacks on Social Security reform:

To the Editor:

"Rep. Richard A. Gephardt attacks Social Security reforms incorporating voluntary personal accounts as "crazy, dumb", saying "It means you'll have to cut benefits for today's elderly." Neither charge is true. Dozens of countries around the world have already moved to personal accounts, including the U.K. and Australia, and almost two-thirds of Americans under 65 told a March 2002 poll commissioned by the non-partisan National Public Radio that they would switch to personal accounts if given the choice. Furthermore, the Social Security proposals put forward by the Bush administration's bipartisan reform commission were certified by Social Security's own actuaries to make no changes whatsoever for any American aged 55 and over. Charges of cuts for today's retirees are nothing but election-year trickery, and provably false. (Those desiring information on the Bush commission's proposals can find all they need at www.csss.gov.)"

"Moreover, the Commission's majority plan would not just save Social Security for the traditional 75-year period, but make it healthy permanently. Rep. Gephardt has refused to say what he would do to save Social Security. Until he puts a detailed plan on the table, we can only assume he favors the status quo. The trouble is, the status quo allows Social Security to go broke."

2005 Index | 2004 Index
2003 Index | 2002 Index | 2001 Index
2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Social Security pays more than $450 billion in benefits each year. If nothing is done, by 2060, the combination of Social Security and Medicare will account for more than 71 percent of the federal budget.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"And there are more ideas-driven initiatives to come, including the partial privatization of Social Security, an issue that would still be unthinkable were it not for the relentless agitation of places like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute."

- The Economist
February 10, 2001