About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Opponents of Accounts Attack on Transition Costs

September 13, 2000

This week saw three attacks on personal retirement accounts by opponents who claimed that funding the transition to accounts would inevitably mean cuts in benefits. For instance, Henry Aaron, Bob Ball and Alicia Munnell wrote to Gov. Bush demanding answers as to how he would fund deposits to personal retirement accounts without cutting Social Security benefits to current retirees. "Over the next decade, those individual accounts will cost the trust fund at least $1 trillion. We believe the question is simple and direct: Where will the $1 trillion come from to protect Social Security benefits? We do not understand how you are going to keep your promise not to cut Social Security benefits for those at or near retirement, while diverting substantial payroll tax revenues into private accounts."

Economist turned columnist Paul Krugman made the same point in the New York Times last Wednesday: Bush "proposes to allow individuals to invest part of the money they currently contribute to Social Security, which will reduce the inflow of money into the Social Security system by $1.3 trillion over the next decade -- and that he insists he will not cut benefits. But if contributions are down, and benefits are not, where does the money come from?"

Even Social Security Commission Kenneth Apfel raised concerns that depositing money in personal accounts to pay benefits tomorrow would reduce the money available to pay benefits today. "The taxes that we all pay go to pay benefits to people," Apfel told the Associated Press recently. "If we take that money and you keep it in your own individual account, then how are we paying for your grandma? That's a real serious question."

These are serious questions, but the answers show that fears of benefit cuts are unjustified. If every worker had a personal account funded with two percent of his wages, deposits over the ten years from 2000-2009 would total $988 billion, based on data compiled by Social Security's Trustees. If only workers under age 50 took part, deposits would total approximately $800 billion. Between 2000-2009 Social Security will run payroll tax surpluses totaling $928 billion in cash and an additional $1.2 trillion in interest on the trust fund. In other words, we can easily afford to fund personal retirement accounts without cutting benefits by a penny. Grandma has nothing to worry about.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Social Security faces an unfunded liability of more than $12.8 trillion.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"The Cato Institute, a Washington think tank, has spent about $3 million in the past six years to run a virtual war room to promote Social Security privatization."

- Glenn Kessler
The Washington Post
July 9, 2001