About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

The Guiding Principles of the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security

November 13, 2001

The President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security will present the Bush Administration with proposals that adhere to the Commission's guiding principles.

  • Modernization must not change Social Security benefits for retirees or near-retirees.


  • The entire Social Security surplus must be dedicated only to Social Security.


  • Social Security payroll taxes must not be increased.


  • The government must not invest Social Security funds in the stock market.


  • Modernization must preserve Social Security's disability and survivors insurance programs.


  • Modernization must include individually controlled, voluntary personal retirement accounts, which will augment Social Security.

2002 Index | 2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Social Security pays more than $450 billion in benefits each year. If nothing is done, by 2060, the combination of Social Security and Medicare will account for more than 71 percent of the federal budget.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"And there are more ideas-driven initiatives to come, including the partial privatization of Social Security, an issue that would still be unthinkable were it not for the relentless agitation of places like the Heritage Foundation and the Cato Institute."

- The Economist
February 10, 2001