About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

An Opt-Out Option?

November 17, 1999

Cato receives many inquiries concerning the possibility of "opting out" of Social Security. But until new Social Security privatization legislation is passed, there is no individual opt-out available.

Sec. 3101 of the Internal Revenue Code mandates that "there is hereby imposed on the income of every individual a tax equal to the following percentages of the wages," presently 6.2 percent. The employer must match the employee's tax payment. Sec. 3102 of the IRS code mandates that employers deduct payroll taxes from workers' wages and submit them to the government. In short, the payroll tax is mandatory on every worker, regardless of whether he or she has a Social Security number.

There are several exemptions:

  • State and local government workers participating in alternative retirement systems of their employers.
  • Election workers earning $1,000 or less a year.
  • Career federal employees hired before 1984 who did not choose Social Security coverage.
  • College students working at their academic institutions.
  • Household workers earning less than $1,100 per year, and those under age 18 for whom household work is not their principal occupation.
  • Self-employed workers with annual net earnings below $400.
  • Ministers may choose not to be covered, though 90 percent of ministers have opted for coverage).
  • Religious Opposition. A religious exemption is granted if both the employer and employee are members of a religious group established prior to 1951 that is "conscientiously opposed to acceptance of the benefits of any private or public insurance which makes payments in the event of death, disability, old-age, or retirement or makes payments toward the cost of, or provides services for, medical care (including the benefits of any insurance system established by the Social Security Act)." Prominent instances of such groups are the Amish and Mennonites.

None of these exceptions, however, establishes a general opt-out, wherein an ordinary worker would forego claims to future benefits in order to be allowed to invest his payroll taxes on his own.

That is why Social Security privatization is so important. Only new legislation can give workers the legal right to save their own payroll taxes in their own personal account, and the property right to their savings such that it can never be taken away.

2001 Index | 2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  A medium income worker born after 1965 can expect a rate-of-return of less than 2% on his or her Social Security taxes.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"The push to convert Social Security into a system of personal accounts has been led by the Cato Institute."

- Paul Krugman
New York Times
September 6, 2002