About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Rep. Shaw Promotes Urgent Personal Account Legislation

December 16, 2003

On the issue of reform, postponing legislation toward a system of individual accounts is least effective way to strengthen Social Security, writes Rep. Clay Shaw (R-Fla.), chairman of the Ways and Means subcommittee on Social Security and sponsor of the Social Security Guarantee Plus Plan. Excerpts of Representative Shaw's Roll Call article, "'Complacent Inaction' Leads to Broken Promises," follow:

"With so many pressing needs [facing our nation], it could be easy to say we can wait to strengthen Social Security, but this would be a grave mistake. Complacent inaction only increases the cost of a solution and risks saddling workers with a legacy of debt and broken promises.

"Social Security is the safeguard of America's families. … That is why we must address Social Security's financial challenges and ensure its promises are kept. ... People are living longer, families are having fewer children, and as a result there are only 3.3 workers for each retiree. By 2030, there will be just over two workers for each retiree.

"These eye-opening demographics matter, because Social Security is not a savings plan, it is a pay-as-you-go system. … As the number of workers supporting each retiree declines, Social Security's finances worsen. According to Social Security's independent scorekeepers, benefits paid by the system will exceed revenues in just 15 years. … Over the next 75 years, the total cash shortfall we face in paying promised benefits equals more than $90,000 for every man, woman, and child in America today.

"To the degree they are talking about Social Security's future at all, some Democrat leaders and presidential candidates have suggested increasing the level of wages subject to Social Security tax and even other tax increases. At best, this would only defer the day of reckoning a few years. Tax increases and benefit cuts have been tried before and failed to create firm financial footing for Social Security.

"Instead, we must look to successful alternatives and learn from the experience of countries like England, Australia, and Sweden. These countries have ensured that both old and young alike will receive fair benefits in retirement by adding personal accounts to their pension systems.

"Some policymakers try to demonize plans that include personal accounts as 'privatization.' This is a dishonest description, because no plan introduced in legislation would replace Social Security with a private entity or terminate an individual's right to their federally entitled benefits. Despite such efforts to mislead, Americans understand the value of giving workers the opportunity to own and control personal accounts that build a nest egg for retirement and help ensure Social Security's financial future. According to a recent Gallup poll, 62 percent of Americans favor personal accounts.

"Social Security's impartial experts have proven that America's support of personal accounts is justified. Contrary to claims that plans with personal accounts would harm Social Security and cut benefits, numerous proposals with personal accounts have been shown to bolster Social Security's balance sheet, create sustainable program financing and provide higher benefits than could be paid under current law.

"Under my plan, [Social Security Guarantee Plus Plan (H.R. 75)], workers would voluntarily invest tax credits equaling a portion of their wages into a choice of diversified portfolios. When they retire, they would receive the higher of the benefit provided by the personal account or their full Social Security benefit. If they die before retirement, the personal account would pass to their family tax-free. Social Security's experts have evaluated my plan and confirmed it saves Social Security for the next 75 years and beyond. This plan also enables us to enhance benefits for elderly and disabled widows and divorced spouses.

"While there is no easy answer to addressing Social Security's massive cash shortfall, personal accounts cost less in the long run. Rather than simply raising taxes to pay full benefits, these accounts save funds today to pay future benefits and harness the power of compound interest and the greater returns available through safe investment in America's economy. Personal accounts make the fiscal choices Democrats and Republicans must face easier, not harder.

"In the coming year, Americans will vote again on leaders who will be responsible for our nation's future. We must and should debate these issues nationwide and challenge each candidate to identify the solutions they support to secure Social Security's future. It's not enough for candidates to say what they're against, it's what they're for that matters."

2005 Index | 2004 Index
2003 Index | 2002 Index | 2001 Index
2000 Index | 1999 Index | 1998 Index





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  48 million Americans receive Social Security benefits, including 33 million retirees, 7 million survivors, and 8 million disabled workers.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"The largely Cato Institute-staffed presidential commission owes its existence to the Cato Institute itself. For the last quarter of a century, the Washington, D.C.-based libertarian think tank has been campaigning for the privatization of Social Security."

- William O'Rourke
Chicago Sun Times
August 28, 2001