About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

Pro-Privatization Candidate Wins Virginia Special Election

In a race with national implications, Republican State representative Randy Forbes survived a massive media campaign attacking his support for individual Social Security accounts to win a special election for Congress from Virginia's 4th District. The election was held to fill the seat of Representative Norman Sisisky, a Democrat who held the seat for nearly 20 years before his death in March.

Forbes supports proposals to allow younger workers to invest a portion of their social security taxes in individual accounts, and Democrats poured money into a series of television ads attacking his position. Among them was the infamous "angina attack" ad that implied Social security privatization would lead to heart attacks among seniors who wouldn't be able to stand the stress of stock market fluctuations. Democratic strategists were blunt about using this race as a test for anti-privatization tactics they plan to use in the 2002 congressional elections.

But despite this concerted attack, Forbes emerged victorious. Moreover, he did this in a District that was 40 percent African-American and where 50 percent of voters were over the age of 55. "[The outcome] shows that senior citizens are not going to buy into false claims about social security," Forbes noted.

Virginia's Fourth district is a swing district and considered something of a national bellwether. George W. Bush carried it in 2000 by fewer than 500 votes, but Bill Clinton carried the district twice. The failure of anti-privatization scare tactics in this race should embolden pro-privatization candidates nationwide.

Polls consistently show that voters strongly support giving younger workers the option to privately invest their Social security funds. A Zogby-Cato poll, conducted early this year, found nearly 70 percent of voters supporting privatization. However, despite the polls, politicians have been slow to campaign on the issue. (A conspicuous exception was George W. Bush, who also overcame a media blitz criticizing his privatization proposals). The Forbes victory should be further proof that politicians can actively support individual accounts--and win.

Michael Tanner
Director of Health and Welfare Studies
The Cato Institute
Washington





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  Nearly two-thirds of those under 30 years old don't think Social Security will be able to pay them any benefit when they stop working. Fifty-seven percent of people 30 to 49 years old agree.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"...the Cato Institute, the libertarian think tank that has been the most passionate proponent of privatization."

- The Washington Post
June 7, 2001