
August 28, 1996
No Longer the Third Rail
by Michael Tanner
Michael Tanner is director of health and welfare studies at the Cato Institute.
Social Security has long been, in former House Speaker Tip O'Neill's
words, the "third rail" of American politics -- touch it and your
political career dies. The underlying belief is that American voters will not
tolerate any major change to the program.
However, according to a poll of 800 registered voters conducted
by Public Opinion Strategies on behalf of the Cato Project on Social Security
Privatization, the public understands Social Security's problems and strongly
supports efforts to privatize the system.
No one should doubt the continued popularity of Social Security.
Our poll results clearly show that Social Security remains one of the most popular
of all government programs -- two-thirds of respondents hold a favorable view
of the program. That popularity cuts across all age groups. Even among baby
boomers and Generation X, groups that have expressed skepticism about the program's
future, Social Security is viewed as a program that has succeeded for 60 years
in ensuring a dignified retirement for elderly Americans.
Beneath the surface, though, there is a growing awareness that
Social Security faces significant problems and needs reform. Only 37 percent
of Americans believe that the current Social Security system is fair. In addition,
far more Americans describe the current system as risky than describe it as
safe or secure. A majority of Americans, 56 percent, believes the system either
is already in trouble or will be in trouble in the next five to 10 years.
That is why young people do not believe that Social Security will
be there for them. Fully 60 percent of all individuals under the age of 65 express
that belief, as do larger majorities of younger voters.
As a result, more than two-thirds of respondents believe that
Social Security will require "major" or "radical" change
within the next 20 years. Approximately half of younger voters believe that
major or radical change is needed today. The support for change cuts across
ideological and party lines.
Certainly there is a good reason for that belief. According to
the latest report of the Social Security system's Board of Trustees, Social
Security will be insolvent by 2029, back from 2030 in last year's report. This
is the eighth time in the last 10 years that the insolvency date has been brought
closer.
But that is not the full story of Social Security's looming crisis.
The important date is 2012. Beginning in that year Social Security will start
to pay out more in benefits than it collects in revenues. To continue meeting
its obligations, it will have to begin drawing on the surplus in the Social
Security trust fund. But the trust fund is really little more than a polite
fiction. For years the federal government has used the trust fund to disguise
the actual size of the federal budget deficit, borrowing money from the trust
fund to pay current operating expenses and replacing the money with government
bonds -- essentially IOUs.
How then to fix Social Security? Our poll shows that a majority
of voters reject most traditional Social Security reforms such as raising the
retirement age, raising payroll taxes, or reducing benefits. They correctly
perceive that such tinkering with the system will simply make it a worse deal
for young workers, who will have to pay higher taxes for fewer benefits.
However, one Social Security reform does have strong popular support
among voters -- privatization. Under privatization the current Social Security
system would be reformed to allow people to take the money they now pay in Social
Security taxes and invest it in their own personal retirement accounts much
-- like IRAs or 401(k)s. More than two-thirds of all voters, 69 percent, would
support transforming the program into a privatized mandatory savings program.
More than three-quarters of younger voters support privatization. This support,
particularly among young voters, cuts across party and ideological lines.
Our poll shows that while Americans recognize that Social Security
has done much to help current seniors retire with dignity, they understand that
the system will not be sustainable in the future. They clearly understand that
reform of the system will be necessary to ensure that today's young workers
will also be able to have a secure and dignified retirement.
As this public support emerges into the political arena, Social
Security will no longer be the third rail of American politics. Indeed, if politicians
refuse to deal with Social Security's problems, they may soon face a new third
rail in their search for support among younger voters.
| Index of Op-Eds |
|