About the Project | Contact Us | Search

cato.org
Its Your Money, Your Choice, Your Future
Cato Institute
Project on Social Security Choice Project on Social Security Choice

Reform and YOU
Social Security Toolkit

Cato's Plan
Get Involved
Press Room
Congressional Corner


Join Us in our efforts —
we need your support.

Donate Today!
 

In Praise and Criticism of Mexico's Pension Reform

Cato Policy Analysis No. 340 April 14, 1999

by L. Jacobo Rodríguez

L. Jacobo Rodríguez is assistant director of the Project on Global Economic Liberty at the Cato Institute.

Executive Summary

The privatization of Mexico’s government-run pay-as-you-go social security system, which went into effect in July 1997, is the Ernesto Zedillo administration’s most important structural reform. It is a measure that, if successful, will help bring much-needed social and economic stability. The Mexican peso crisis of 1994–95 underscored the fragility of Mexico’s economy, its need for independent institutions, and its need for a large pool of long-term domestic savings. An increase in the rate of private savings in Mexico, which this reform will promote, would make the Mexican economy less dependent on short-term fluctuations of international capital flows and, thus, more stable. More important still, the privatization of social security will erect one of the basic pillars of a free society by turning Mexico into a country of property-owning workers.

The private system, however, has several structural flaws that should be corrected in the near future if it is to provide workers with the right incentives. Chief among those flaws is the requirement to invest a minimum of 65 percent of workers’ savings in government instruments, a rule that is not consistent with the notion of pension privatization. Other flaws include prohibiting investment in equities or abroad; allowing the government agency that administered the old pay-as-you-go system to establish a pension fund company while retaining some regulatory functions; prohibiting public-sector workers from joining the new private system; and having the government subsidize every worker’s retirement account, a measure that politicizes the private pension system and weakens the link between individual efforts and rewards.

President Zedillo should use his remaining time in office to strengthen the new pension system so that Mexican workers can enjoy financial security and other benefits in their old age.

Policy Analysis No. 340 (PDF format, 15 pp. 106 Kb)

| Index of Briefing Papers | Cato Policy Analysis |





Printer Friendly Version


  Quick Facts Archive  
  The Social Security payroll tax rate has grown from just 2 percent in 1949 to 12.4 percent today.
[Details...]
 
Research Corner
 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

Social Security's Financial Crisis
Rate of Return Issues
Women, Minorities, and the Poor
Other Reasons for Social Security Reform
Government Investment of Social Security
Social Security Reform Plans
International Pension Reform
Transition Financing
Problems and Criticisms
Public Opinion and Polling

BROWSE BY AUTHOR Go

BROWSE BY TYPE Go

 
 

"The libertarian Cato Institute, which has kept the [Social Security] issue alive for two decades, is also a formidable presence in Washington."

- Fred Barnes
Weekly Standard
December 23, 2002